Rubric

Find Rubric
Structure of Jazz Performance
Structure of Jazz Performance
Criteria Ratings Pts
Information Presented
threshold: pts
35 to >33.0 pts
Exceptional Work
The title of the track, album name, and release date are present. All personnel are listed with the instruments they play. The structure of the performance is communicated exceptionally well with all necessary information labeled, including intro, head in, solos, trading, head out, and other miscellaneous events. Timestamps are included for each entry.
33 to >25.0 pts
Sufficient Work
Track title, album name, and release date are present. The personnel are listed with the instruments they play. The structure of the performance is communicated sufficiently clearly. Most of the necessary information is labeled, including intro, head in, solos, trading, head out, and other miscellaneous events. Timestamps are included for most entries.
25 to >15.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
One of the following pieces of album information is missing: track title, album name, and release date. Most of the personnel are listed along with the instruments they play. The structure of the performance is communicated, though not clearly. Missing some of the labels for necessary information (intro, head in, solos, trading, head out, and other miscellaneous events). Timestamps are included but only for some entries.
15 to >10.0 pts
Needs Major Improvement
Two or more of the following pieces of album information are missing: track title, album name, and release date. Some of the personnel and their instruments are listed. The structure of the performance is not communicated clearly and/or is missing most of the necessary event labels. Missing many timestamps for entries.
10 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
None of the album information provided (track, album name, and release date). Neither the personnel nor the instruments they play are listed. The structure of the performance is not communicated and includes none of the necessary information labeled. Timestamps are not included for entries.
pts
35 pts
--
Accuracy
threshold: pts
5 pts
Exceptional Work
Represents the performance accurately with proper labeling and instrumentation.
4 pts
Sufficient Work
Represents the performance mostly accurately with labeling and instrumentation.
3 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Represents the performance somewhat accurately with labeling and instrumentation.
2 pts
Needs Major Improvement
Does not represent the performance accurately; labeling and instrumentation are messy at best.
0 pts
Unacceptable
Inaccurately represents the performance and contains no proper labeling and instrumentation.
pts
5 pts
--
Organization
threshold: pts
10 to >9.0 pts
Exceptional Work
The submission is organized clearly and logically.
9 to >7.0 pts
Sufficient Work
The submission is mostly organized and logically presented.
7 to >4.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
The submission is somewhat organized and logical.
4 to >1.0 pts
Needs Major Improvement
The submission is poorly organized and not very logical.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The submission is disorganized and/or illogical in its presentation.
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 50 out of 50