Final Project Milestone: Bibliography Check In (MUSC-1236_David Baker) | Julie Swindler

  • Due No Due Date
  • Points 10
  • Submitting a file upload

Why we are including this example

 

Submit  

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to help keep you up to date on your bibliography so you won't have a last-minute, mad rush to find all your sources. You're welcome.

Task

Please turn in your bibliography for your final project up to this point. This assignment is a check-in to ensure you are making steady progress on the bibliography and your formatting is still consistent. Please be sure to include all sources you intend to use so far. This will include a minimum of 5-9 modules and the videos/articles/lectures containing your selected topics. 

Criteria

Grading will be based on the same rubric used in the first bibliography assignment (see attached rubric below).

0

Rubric

Find Rubric
MUSC-1236 Bibliography Check
MUSC-1236 Bibliography Check
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description
References
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 pts
Exceptional Work
All references contain the author's name, publication name, article or video title, link to source material, and a date published when possible. (100%)
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
Sufficient Work
Most references contain the author's name, publication name, article/video title, link to source material, and a date published when possible. (80-99%)
Edit rating Delete rating
3 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Some references contain the author's name, publication name, article/video title, link to source material, and a date published when possible. (50-79%)
Edit rating Delete rating
2 pts
Needs Major Improvement
Few references contain the author's name, publication name, article/video title, link to source material, and a date published when possible. (1-49%)
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
Inadequate
No references contain the author's name, publication name, article/video title, link to source material, and a date published when possible. (0%)
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Format
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 pts
Exceptional Work
All references are formatted consistently with the same information presented in the same way.
Edit rating Delete rating
4 pts
Sufficient Work
1-2 formatting inconsistencies.
Edit rating Delete rating
3 pts
Needs Some Improvement
3-4 formatting inconsistencies.
Edit rating Delete rating
2 pts
Needs Major Improvement
5-6 formatting inconsistencies.
Edit rating Delete rating
0 pts
Inadequate
7+ formatting inconsistencies.
pts
5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 10 out of 10