You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Final Module: Submit Final Project (EDUC 6440 Sean Crossland) | Linda Sellers

Due No Due Date
Points 0
Submitting a file upload

Why we are including this example

After Class Submit

Purpose:

Culminating assignment for the semester

Task:

Final Projects

Feedback Criteria:

See rubric

Rubric

Title:

Final Project

Criteria

Ratings

Edit criterion description

Sources and Evidence

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and/or relevant sources to support ideas that are appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in writing.

Edit criterion description

Use Information Effectively to Accomplish a Specific Purpose

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Communicates, organizes, and synthesizes information from sources to fully achieve a specific purpose with clarity and depth.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Communicates, organizes, and synthesizes information from sources. Intended purpose is achieved.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Communicates and organizes information from sources. The information is not yet synthesized, so the intended purpose is not fully achieved.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Communicates information from sources. The information is fragmented and/or used inappropriately (misquoted, taken out of context, or incorrectly paraphrased, etc.), so the intended purpose is not achieved.

Edit criterion description

Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Presents in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Presents information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches.

Edit criterion description

Analysis of Knowledge

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline to civic engagement and to tone's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one's own academic study/field/discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one's own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

Edit criterion description

Conclusions

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.

Edit criterion description

Embracing Contradictions

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Integrates alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives or ideas fully.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Incorporates alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives or ideas in an exploratory way.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Includes (recognizes the value of) alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives or ideas in a small way.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Acknowledges (mentions in passing) alternate, divergent, or contradictory perspectives or ideas.

Edit criterion description

Innovative Thinking

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Extends a novel or unique idea, question, format, or product to create new knowledge or knowledge that crosses boundaries.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Creates a novel or unique idea, question, format, or product.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Experiments with creating a novel or unique idea, question, format, or product.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Reformulates a collection of available ideas.

Edit criterion description

Civic Identity and Commitment

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Provides evidence of experience in civic-engagement activities and describes what she/he has learned about her or himself as it relates to a reinforced and clarified sense of civic identity and continued commitment to public action.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Provides evidence of experience in civic-engagement activities and describes what she/he has learned about her or himself as it relates to a growing sense of civic identity and commitment.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Evidence suggests involvement in civic-engagement activities is generated from expectations or course requirements rather than from a sense of civic identity.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Provides little evidence of her/his experience in civic-engagement activities and does not connect experiences to civic identity.

Edit criterion description

Reflection and Self-Assessment

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Envisions a future self (and possibly makes plans that build on past experiences that have occurred across multiple and diverse contexts).

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Evaluates changes in own learning over time, recognizing complex contextual factors (e.g., works with ambiguity and risk, deals with frustration, considers ethical frameworks).

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Articulates strengths and challenges (within specific performances or events) to increase effectiveness in different contexts (through increased self-awareness).

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Describes own performances with general descriptors of success and failure.

Edit criterion description

Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Edit rating Delete rating

Capstone

Uses graceful language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency and is virtually error-free.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 2

Uses straightforward language that generally conveys meaning to readers. The language in the project has few errors.

Edit rating Delete rating

Milestone 1

Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity, although writing may include some errors.

Edit rating Delete rating

Benchmark

Uses language that sometimes impedes meaning because of errors in usage.

Rubric

Find a Rubric

Title:

Title

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

Description of criterion

Range

threshold: 5 pts

Edit rating Delete rating

5 pts

Full Marks

Edit rating Delete rating

0 pts

No Marks

pts

5 pts

Total Points: 5 out of 5